Comment on Historians never talk about the "good old days".
gigachad@piefed.social 18 hours agoThis may be a language barrier. In my native language a historian is a scientist researching history. But maybe I just don’t understand what you want to say.
frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 hours ago
It’s somewhat complicated. “Scientist” can have a very specific definition where only “hard science” (Physics, Chemistry, etc.) qualifies. Personally, I think that definition is too narrow, is usually used to disparage fields where it’s impossible to apply strict experimental techniques, and often privileges areas of study that just happen to be male-dominated.
How do you even run an experiment in history? Since you basically can’t, is that a reason to invalidate everything the field does? The way a lot of people talk, it almost seems like it, but it’s completely absurd.
gigachad@piefed.social 2 hours ago
Just wanted to tell you it even differs in different languages. I know where you are going though. However regarding this post, at least where I come from you can get a university degree in History. If you want to call that science or not, “good” is no legitimate assessment in any discipline.