Yes, but it does not have redundancy or caching. Redundancy can be achieved with snapraid, but how you get caching I don’t know…
Comment on Why is Unraid popular in the self-hosting community ?
daq@lemmy.sdf.org 4 days agoMergerfs can do that too and you can keep the underlying fs as whatever you want.
B0rax@feddit.org 4 days ago
daq@lemmy.sdf.org 2 days ago
Doesn’t work for every use case, but perfect for mine. I was just pointing out other options.
B0rax@feddit.org 2 days ago
And that is good! It would have been a better answer if you mentioned these major limitations as well so that interested people don’t need to look it up :)
MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 days ago
It has no parity, you can pair with snapraid but thats snapshot parity and not real-time parity. Depends on the use case if that would work or not.
daq@lemmy.sdf.org 2 days ago
Valid points. I use it for my media collection I can easily restore and won’t miss. Cache would be sort of nice to have and redundancy would just be wasting space.
MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 days ago
Yeah media is a good use case for it, and doesnt really need cache either.