Much of the time, AI paraphrases, because it is generating plausible sentences not quoting factual material. Rarely do I see direct quotes that don’t involve some form of editorialising or restating of information, but perhaps I’m just not asking those sorts of questions much.
Comment on Wikipedia Says AI Is Causing a Dangerous Decline in Human Visitors
GaryGhost@lemmy.world 2 days agoAI just cuts pastes from the websites like Wikipedia. The problem is when it gets information that’s old or from a sketchy source. Hopefully people will still know how to check sources, should probably be taught in schools. Who’s the author, how olds the article, is it a reputable website, is there a bias. I know I’m missing some pieces
ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 2 days ago
veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Man, we hardly did that shit 20 years ago. Ain’t no way the kids doing that now.
EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 2 days ago
You replied to OP while somehow missing the entire point of what he said lol
GaryGhost@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Do be fair I didn’t read the article
mriormro@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
That’s not ‘being fair’ that’s just you admitting you’d rather hear your own blathering voice than do any real work.
GaryGhost@lemmy.world 1 day ago
To be fair calling that work is stretching it