Comment on Microsoft wants you to talk to your PC and let AI control it

• Alaknar@sopuli.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  If you only interpret “transparent” as “open source”, then yeah, I agree.

  If, however, you also consider “well documented” as “transparent”, then what exactly is the deal?

  And it’s already going to be opt-in.

  source

  • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    If you only interpret “transparent” as “open source”, then yeah, I agree.

    Technically, yes. what I really mean is that people can look at it and determine it does not want to fuck people over, but that probably can’t really be done practically without it being open source.

    If, however, you also consider “well documented” as “transparent”, then what exactly is the deal?

    I don’t trust microsoft with having an accurate, honest documentation on something like this. but this reminded me of another aspect that even being open source does not really solve: what about changes in the future? I could be reading the docs or the source now, but I won’t even get to know when it updates.

    And it’s already going to be opt-in.

    I have my doubts about whether they’ll keep it that way

    source