Comment on Any advice for me a guy turning 18 yo old??
Aequitas@feddit.org 5 days agoReligions are fairy tales for children who are afraid of death. They have nothing to do with reality. There is no god and no rational reason to believe in one. Part of growing up is accepting that.
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 4 days ago
Except from that guy who did miracles and stuff and rose from the dead
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 4 days ago
That guy is a character in a book that wasn’t written until decades after his supposed death. And those stories that made it into the book were knowingly cherry picked and modified to fit a narrative that the Romans wanted to push at the time.
The only “evidence” he rose from the dead was that someone wrote down that someone told someone else that they knew of a few people that saw an empty cave a few days after they had stuffed a corpse in it. And said book also contains a contradicting story about the same event.
So not exactly screaming reliable primary source…
There’s more evidence that Spider-Man exists/ed.
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 4 days ago
Wait until you hear about most of history… A lot of people we think we know were written CENTURIES after their death.
That they were occupiers and killed the son of God? yikes
No, some of the writings were first hand eyewitnesses, the rest were people who personally knew numerous people who saw Him.
No it doesn’t.
No, because Spider Man is never claiming to be a true story and nobody ever claimed to be Spiderman. We also have a name - Stan Lee - who wrote the story and has no qualms saying it is fake. 2 billion people around the world don’t believe in Spiderman.
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 4 days ago
A story claiming to be true does not make it more true than one that doesn’t make that claim.
But if that’s your sticking point, Lord of the Rings. It claims to be a translation of a true story. Was Frodo real?
A story claiming to have eye witnesses to events doesn’t mean there were any, the author can say anything that makes their work sound more believable, and given that there were no other documents making those completely unbelievable claims, they remain unbelievable fictions.
It kind of sound like you are unaware of the council of nicaea…where they decided to make Jesus a divine figure, and not just a prophet, among other stories they twisted and chose to suit their needs. We may not know their exact names, but we know the group and the months they met to write this book.
Aequitas@feddit.org 4 days ago
How do you know that happened? You can write anything in a book. But just because it’s written down doesn’t mean that hobbits, wizards, or dragons really exist.
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 4 days ago
So Napoleon didn’t exist, then?
Aequitas@feddit.org 4 days ago
There is historical evidence for Napoleon. The same applies to Jesus. What does not exist is evidence for miracles, God, or other magical phenomena. Historical documents are never treated uncritically. One important criterion, for example, is plausibility. If a document states that Napoleon could breathe fire, it may say so, but it would not be recognized as historical fact. And the Bible is no more than that. A text with mythological stories for people who thought that a rainbow was a sign from God.
Seriously: how stupid do you have to be to consider hearsay stories from 2000+ years ago as empirical evidence? You don’t do that for stories from Greece, Scandinavia, Egypt, or India with their religious legends. It’s just mythology. And to be honest, it’s just embarrassing to take it seriously.