Comment on EU Chat Control didnt pass - proving the media got to alot of you
iii@mander.xyz 6 days agoThat’s the same EU that mandates online de-anonymisation as a last minute amendment to an unrelated CSAM-directive.
Comment on EU Chat Control didnt pass - proving the media got to alot of you
iii@mander.xyz 6 days agoThat’s the same EU that mandates online de-anonymisation as a last minute amendment to an unrelated CSAM-directive.
Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 5 days ago
Have you read the sources you posted?
Nobody is mandating anything - yet.
Sure, it might end up like that, but - to date - the Commission has been rather sensible when it comes to such things. They also have the example of UK that shows that the law works against its intentions by driving people towards unregulated and more dangerous websites.
We’ll see how it goes.
iii@mander.xyz 5 days ago
That’s simply how any EU directive works: EU decides what must happen, and it’s up to the individual countries to put it into their respective laws.
When has that ever stopped a puritan?
Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 5 days ago
Wow, it’s so weird that the article you linked lied, then!
iii@mander.xyz 5 days ago
No, it’s saying that exaxt thing: online users of porn must be deanonymised on penalty of prison.
It’s just that the countries themselves can choose the particulates: who will do the deanonymisation, in what way, what will enforcement look like, etc.
Every EU directive works that way: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directive_(European_Union)