You mean the post that literally says otherwise and that the quote from OP I had in my original comment agreed with?
Thanks, I appreciate you also replying in good faith. I don’t think this is likely to be a topic we’ll be able to come to alignment on within a community thread. We’re unfortunately in a world where it’s hard to have nuanced discussion, even if we preemptively agree on 95% of topics and want to discuss the remaining 5%, in a public forum.
- nrp
** perhaps it is indeed best to let it rest for now. i’ll certainly sleep on it now!** :slight_smile:
-anarcat
Yes, I can see the reading is strong with you.
SL3wvmnas@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
plus it’s their CEO, or their community manager in their name, directly addressing the questioner and going “you don’t understand, under our big tent approach only 5% of people we give money to are controversial, let’s not address your concerns and move on.”