Comment

Comment on Framework supporting far-right racists?

To put it in terms of your analogy, it’s one thing to use Mengele’s research after he’s been stopped. It’s another entirely to give his research funding when he’s actively running the program.

One is making use of knowledge that comes out of terrible things, the other is complicit behavior that borders on active encouragement or collaboration.

source

Sort:hotnew top

chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
That is fair. My example was extreme, though. These people are just assholes. Do you throw away the code of an asshole because they’re an asshole?

source
- lama@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  You don’t fund them, that’s for sure
  
  source
- aesthelete@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  To use another example, a musician might be known to be an asshole during their lifetime. Then they die. Is it harmful to listen to their music if you’re not contributing anything to their estate or their estate isn’t run by similar assholes? It’s debatable and a gray area, but I’d probably say no in most circumstances.
  
  How about if they’re known to be an asshole and you buy their albums anyway, you go to their concerts, and you loudly pronounce on social media how you support them and that their work is great? That’s a much easier case to make to say, yes, you’re being harmful.
  
  You’re supporting someone who is an asshole, and you’re doing–at least–two types of harm:
  
  (1) you’re demonstrating tolerance for shitty behavior which does not provide a good negative reinforcement to correct the shitty behavior, and
  
  (2) you’re positively reinforcing the shitty behavior through your support
  
  It might be more nuanced if there were higher stakes involved, such as if the good belying this debate was of crucial need to help along a much larger good cause. But that’s where particulars matter. These contributions these assholes are making are not solving world hunger. They’re nerdy little Linux bits.
  
  Use the bullshit all you want, but for fuck’s sake stop materially supporting and going on a promotional tour with the villains that made it.
  
  source
- AbidanYre@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  I think yous do bed to factor in how prominent that person is on the project.
  
  If an asshole contributes some code to a project, ok. If an asshole is the public face of the project, well, there are plenty of alternatives to use/fund instead.
  
  source
Damage@feddit.it ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Yeah sure so you’ve destroyed your car, stopped buying fuel, gave up sigarettes, stopped buying stuff from Amazon, gave up the supermarket, single use plastics, gave up Windows and let’s be honest, any other computer manufacturer aside from super niche ones? Because I guarantee you that the money you spend in that stuff is magnitudes more damaging than whatever tiny bit of a framework computer’s value is going towards these two developers, let alone the fraction that they may actually invest in nefarious deeds.

People need to learn to pick their battles.

source
- aesthelete@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  A key difference here is that Framework is trying to build a “community”. At least some of their value depends upon community if you think about it for a bit (e.g., if nobody uses the marketplaces, they’d be empty of goods and a lot of the point is lost).
  
  If they center assholes as being representative of what the community is about, they naturally exclude others by doing so.
  
  It’s easy to take the “can’t we all just get along?” stance with this, but some things require a little more reasoning and philosophy than platitudes.
  
  What good is a big tent if most normal people left the tent because you let someone stand on stage at the tent’s center and go on long, racist tirades?
  
  source