Comment on Alternative to ClamAV?
nexusband@lemmy.world 1 year ago
There are none. ClamAV is the only one there is, because it has a very specific and narrow purpose. There are no viruses for Linux.
Chrootkit and rkhunter are also built for very specific things (detecting rootkits - or making them) and are not designed to protect, they are designed to analyse.
My writing here also isn’t specifically to OP, but to all others that may find this thread - Anti Virus for Linux is BS and unless you are running SMB and still have lots of Windows in your network, it’s absolutely not needed, especially if you follow the basics (like not doing stuff as root, using sudo and not giving out any system rights).
Kangie@lemmy.srcfiles.zip 1 year ago
Blatant lies.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_malware
nexusband@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Which is exactly what I said. ClamAV serves a very specific purpose and that’s this one.
There are still no viruses for Linux specifically designed to break in to Linux, because it’s not possible.
Kangie@lemmy.srcfiles.zip 1 year ago
Here is just one example that proves your assertion wrong.
www.f-secure.com/v-descs/slapper.shtml
mathemachristian@lemm.ee 1 year ago
So if I’m reading this correct the vulnerability was patched before the worm got programmed and it peaked at 2000 machines infected when it targeted apache servers running openssl, which back in 2002 was basically any encrypted website.
Don’t know how an AV would have helped there.
nexusband@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Right. Completely proven wrong.
peter@feddit.uk 1 year ago
Mirai and other botnets, coin miners, ransomware… Do you think that malware makers just decided to ignore the billions of Linux servers and IoT devices that exist?
Zeth0s@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I agree with you, but, it is also true that the overwhelming majority of ransomware affect windows statista.com/…/major-operating-systems-targeted-b…