Comment on Why can't we have a static vintage web?
Not without bugs to patch.
At the browser level?
Otherwise,
can haz
<html>simple site</html>
I believe that the text would have to be in at least a <body> tag, so… you’ve got a bug. But yes, I was including browser bugs.
<body>
Do you know of any browsers that would not render <html>simple site</html>?
I just tested it in brave, dillo, librewolf, links, and it works in each.
I only recently discovered this (that contrary to prior belief and training), even <body> is unnecessary.
Digit@lemmy.wtf 5 days ago
At the browser level?
Otherwise,
can haz
<html>simple site</html>TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub 5 days ago
I believe that the text would have to be in at least a
<body>tag, so… you’ve got a bug. But yes, I was including browser bugs.Digit@lemmy.wtf 4 days ago
Do you know of any browsers that would not render <html>simple site</html>?
I just tested it in brave, dillo, librewolf, links, and it works in each.
I only recently discovered this (that contrary to prior belief and training), even <body> is unnecessary.