Comment on Did something change recently with how Mastodon displays content from Lemmy / the threadiverse?
flamingos@feddit.uk 1 day agoIf it has a summary, I will use that as the content
But isn’t that how Mastodon handles content warnings? Baffling that they’d do it like that frankly given that it prevents long-form content (when masto actually starts supporting that) from being CW’d.
julian@activitypub.space 1 day ago
Not necessarily, no. Content warnings were implemented in Mastodon specifically as
summaryplussensitive=true. Perhaps not originally, but that is enforced now (all CW'd posts from Mastodon are marked sensitive). Might be Mastodon will CW notes that don't havesensitive, out of caution, but this doesn't apply to non-Notes.So a summary included in a non-Note is not CW'd by Mastodon currently.
flamingos@feddit.uk 1 day ago
I know, I was just saying that it prevents a non-Note from being CW’d, as the
summeryis used as the post’s content. Masto treats aNotemarked assensitivewith nosummaryto just mean to blur the images.julian@activitypub.space 1 day ago
I suppose, although in that scenario theoretically one could add
as:sensitiveto mark the status as CW'd? I don't think CW logic is even run for non-Notes at the moment, though I could be mistaken.flamingos@feddit.uk 1 day ago
Masto interprets a
Noteset asas:sensitivewithout asummaryto mean ‘blur any media attached, but don’t collapse the text content’. I believe the same is true for non-Notes, but obviously without thesummary= CW logic.