Comment on Google's shocking developer decree struggles to justify the urgent threat to F-Droid
_cnt0@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks agoDoesn’t feel like you want to have an honest argument when you ask how far we should go back on a proposal about going forward and don’t address the single motivator ambiguity.
UnpledgedCatnapTipper@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
Correct, because there is no argument to be had. Intentionally refusing to use someone’s pronouns is unacceptable, every time, with 0 exceptions. If there’s a dire need to be explicitly clear you’re talking about a single person, you could just use their name in that instance.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 3 weeks ago
You don’t get to decide how other people refer to you. I’m sorry but you don’t have that authority. You can dislike people using the “wrong” pronouns, but you cannot compel the usage of the ones you want to be called because of your beliefs. If I say my pronouns are “your majesty” it’s not unacceptable if you don’t use them.