Unity employees have extraordinary working conditions and pay. It sucks that their hard work gets tarnished by stupid executives and poor PR but let’s not paint the employee as a victim here.
Comment on Update: Unity office death threat was made by a Unity employee
TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Honestly at this point I feel worse for the guy who made the threat than anyone else. Can you imagine what is like working with those sort of bosses with such exploitative tendencies and an utter disregard for an entire industry? They get to ruin countless lives but if anyone gets mad that’s the unacceptable one who is punished.
Elderos@lemmings.world 1 year ago
SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Or he is just fucked up in the head. That is a possibility too.
TrumpetX@programming.dev 1 year ago
I’m pretty sure killing is a worse way to ruin someone’s life.
TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The number of people being ruined is pretty different though.
I get it, it’s a callous attitude, but I’m wondering if going for civility above anything else is really working out. I’d love to such situations to be settled with a reasonable discussion, but do they ever?
Klear@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Not sending death threats is the bar set for civility these days?
Serinus@lemmy.world 1 year ago
He didn’t kill anyone.
SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 1 year ago
[deleted]FaceDeer@kbin.social 1 year ago
Because a threat is not an attempt. Most likely they had absolutely no intention to carry through with it.
It's still bad but saying "I'm gonna kill you" is not the same as actually trying to kill you.
snek@lemmy.world 1 year ago
But he didn’t just get mad (if this is the full story). He sent them a death threat. I think there is a fine line.
pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
I’ll bite: Death threats are not as serious as tanking an entire company and ruining thousands of lives.
(I don’t actually think that; I just feel like playing devil’s advocate today)
Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Death threats are personal. Corporations can be boycotted.
pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
A fair point. None of the news articles even give us any real, meaningful details as to what happened so we don’t know if it was just execs who were threatened or if, perhaps, there was a bomb threat or something. I wish we could see a screenshot of the actual threat so we could make a determination.
snek@lemmy.world 1 year ago
And I don’t.
HKayn@dormi.zone 1 year ago
Then why don’t they look for work at another company?
Making death threats is still a major dick move regardless of the circumstances.
TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It might have been wiser, but seems to me we got to a point we should be thinking of the circumstances.
Besides, that only would have solved their individual problem, IF they even managed it. The way the company is being run would remain the same. How it would impact all the people who rely on that engine would remain the same.
It’s “never acceptable” to threaten someone, but intentionally ruining countless people’s livelihoods is “nothing personal”. Something is off about that.
HKayn@dormi.zone 1 year ago
You can’t just solve a company’s culture by yourself.
You can either convince enough people to unionize, or you can save yourself.
TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Agreed but I can still understand the frustration.
xantoxis@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It is, but all we have right now is Unity’s claim that this is what happened. We don’t even know the content of the threat, who made it, why they made it. All of that context could cast this in a wildly different light. I am very suspicious of Unity the company’s motives here in saying this when we haven’t heard from anyone else.
snek@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I think it was the police who found out it was an employee.
HKayn@dormi.zone 1 year ago
How can this be cast in any light that’s not negative?
Companies don’t just make up death threats.
xantoxis@lemmy.world 1 year ago
They absolutely do when it benefits them and they think they can get away with it, I don’t know how you could make such a blanket claim without questioning yourself just a little bit.
And of course it would be negative, but I think there’s a chance the claim casts a negative light on the company, and not on the employee, who is as yet unnamed. As it stands now, any of the following could be true:
There’s more, and quite frankly it gets tiresome to see people jumping to defend when ploys like this have been the playbook for shitty companies since the invention of the company.