If your definition is “follower of Christ”, sure, you can argue that Christ can’t follow himself. My definition is “follower of Christ’s teachings”, and he could definitely follow his own teachings.
Comment on Jesus was Jewish, but Christians aren't
QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 4 weeks agoChrist can’t be a “follower of Christ.” The first Christian’s were the Apostles.
hperrin@lemmy.ca 4 weeks ago
NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
If God can be son of himself, then Christ can be follower of Christ
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Jesus (in the Bible!) = “God is one, the Father, and I pray to Him for guidance and strength, and to forgive my sins. I preach righteousness, selflessness and peace amongst us brothers and sisters.”
Jesus for Paulians, Roman Catholics and derivatives = “God is three, one of them is Jesus, and if you believe these two things you’re automatically saved, nvm morals, selflessness and righteousness, that’s optional.”
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 4 weeks ago
Jesus claimed to be equal to God and God Himself in the Bible as well…