I agree that head mounted displays can be useful, I’m contemplating getting something like it, but just no cameras, please. not in the frame, not backwards, not anywhere.
I agree that head mounted displays can be useful, I’m contemplating getting something like it, but just no cameras, please. not in the frame, not backwards, not anywhere.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 weeks ago
If you don’t have cameras you instantly lose a tonne of potential amazing functionality.
If you’re in public you have no expectation of privacy, so someone being able to photograph you or record you with glasses is no different to being able to do it with a camera or phone.
thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
People should still have an expectation of privacy in public spaces to some extent, otherwise the only way is to move to the foresf. One should not have to be concerned about being recorded, especially children (a pdfile can take photos to pick “targets”, so to speak).
d7sdx@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
The pdfile will do it anyways. What concerns me is all those data will be streamed to Meta. They will relay it to Palantir. The best mass surveillance you can think of.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 weeks ago
The glasses don’t record and stream all the time btw. They don’t have their own built in wireless connection to meta.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 weeks ago
Why? You’re in a public space. You don’t have privacy when you’re out in public. There are already laws around taking photos of minors etc, but it being able to be done via glasses is no different to it being able to be done with a phone or a camera.
thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
Unless society gets revolutionized so that people can remain in their homes as much as they want (and even then), that is not an option.