Comment on it's just science, i guess

• Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  My mistake I thought it was a reply in the other comment thread.

  The thing that makes it possibly a good study is that it was published in a good journal from a good school. It’s not Harry Wang’s Big Book of Science. You expect poorly done research in pay to play journals, but less so in biomedcentral.

  I’m still mildly skeptical and have seen people make the claim that it was more likely the age of the mother which has been legitimately associated with higher risks of autism. It makes sense. But having now seen that they’re pushing this shit super hard I’m immediately on guard.

  I hadn’t seen the Trump TV announcement of this dumb shit. This is something worthy of further study not a doctor’s recommendation.

  source

  • LodeMike@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    The study is fine. But its ethos is literally just correlation. The abstract:

    Acetaminophen is the most commonly used over-the-counter pain and fever medication taken during pregnancy, with > 50% of pregnant women using acetaminophen worldwide. Numerous well-designed studies have indicated that pregnant mothers exposed to acetaminophen have children diagnosed with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), including autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), at higher rates than children of pregnant mothers who were not exposed to acetaminophen.

    This has zero cause effect relationship. Its literally the same issue with the vaccine correlation: medical care access.

    source
  • LodeMike@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    I didn’t say the study wasn’t “good” I said its not automatically 100% correct because it’s a study. I haven’t read it let me look at the first page so I can elaborate.

    source