Comment on The Wikipedia page for the fediverse describes a den of iniquity
Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 5 weeks ago
That section is out of line with Wikipedia policies because it only relies upon scholarship that isn't meta-analysis, which Wikipedia considers primary sourcing (an idiosyncratic borrowing that ought to be called firsthand sourcing instead: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Scholarship), making it undue weight.
Ladislawgrowlo@lemy.lol 5 weeks ago
I am confused by these words, and do not understand their real meaning. I think I need to read.
Kissaki@feddit.org 5 weeks ago
A study of studies is a better source than a single study.
Ladislawgrowlo@lemy.lol 5 weeks ago
That makes sense actually.