Comment

Comment on Marketing Doesn't Work on Nerds

White papers are shit written by marketing people who try to make their little ad sound like something academic. In truth these white papers are in equal parts misunderstandings, wrong and full of useless fluff. They are AI slop, often completely without any AI involvement.

If someone is serious about the content, they call it a documentation, reference or datasheet.

source

Sort:hotnew top

funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
some counter examples:

cs.umb.edu/~poneil/lsmtree.pdf

www.cs.cornell.edu/…/lakshman-ladis2009.pdf

www.usenix.org/legacy/event/atc10/…/Hunt.pdf
source
- squaresinger@lemmy.world ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  Those aren’t white papers. They are scientific papers.
  
  White papers are written by companies as a marketing tool. The first two papers you linked above are written by universities and the last one by a research-focussed non-profit.
  
  As per Wikipedia:
  
  Since the 1990s, this type of document has proliferated in business. Today, a business-to-business (B2B) white paper falls under grey literature, more akin to a marketing presentation meant to persuade customers and partners, and promote a certain product or viewpoint.
  
  en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_paper
  
  source
  - funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    While I’m not saying they don’t both exist, there are plenty of people writing the original definition for tech products, too.
    
    And I’d argue that purely scientific papers are often written to promote products and viewpoints, too.
    
    source
- Evotech@lemmy.world ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  There are both
  
  But product whitepapers are ads
  
  source