Comment on Campaigners urge EU to mandate 15 years of OS updates
Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 day agoIf it’s proprietary it doesn’t, between proprietary and FOSS it absolutely does for the reasons I already stated.
Comment on Campaigners urge EU to mandate 15 years of OS updates
Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 day agoIf it’s proprietary it doesn’t, between proprietary and FOSS it absolutely does for the reasons I already stated.
ell1e@leminal.space 1 day ago
eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=…
TL;DR, just donations can already be a problem.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Which exactly includes systems like RedHat which I already included, but in no way includes voluntary FOSS work for free.
Again it’s very much about the money.
NOPE!!!
Donations are not a charge.
ell1e@leminal.space 1 day ago
Did you actually read the quote I gave? I’m honestly confused.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I’m guessing that’s what you are referring to, this is not relevant to normal donations, but only a use of “donations” to circumvent regulation.
Show me any FOSS project that has donations exceeding costs of development, it’s basically non existent, only the Linux kernel project itself, which is fair enough to be covered, since the Linux kernel is driven by commercial interests today.
The claim originally in this line of debate was that small projects could risk this, and no they can’t, only projects that have become commercial are affected.