rather than add burden to OS makers
It’s not a burden for the OS maker, except when the OS is the product, and in that case it’s only fair.
With Android the phone maker adapt the OS to their phones and flavor of Android, if they can’t handle maintaining it, they can use vanilla. Google is the OS maker, and I think they can handle the burden.
thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Solution: implement as consumer protection that only applies to paid OS’s (and also ones that require a license, even if it’s “free” due to coming with the hardware)
JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Then Microsoft makes windows free and monetizes the shit out of services in the OS.
thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Then people move to Linux