I’ve heard mixed reviews, the big problem seems to be stability, at least around my area. I’ve heard it goes down frequently in heavy rain and snow (I’m in Canada), and people have had problems with satellites being blocked by trees (lots of trees in Canada).
For people with no access to Internet as is that’s still a huge upgrade, but for people who were hoping it would open up the possibility of moving to and working remotely in more rural areas without good wired internet coverage it’s a total letdown.
SHOW_ME_YOUR_ASSHOLE@lemm.ee 1 year ago
I agree. It’s the only option for internet in many places. I’m very happy with my Starlink service. I’d drop it in a heartbeat if there was a better option but for now it fits my needs.
Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Obviously the second fibre is available. Half the price and better stability. Fuck musk. But currently it’s leaps and bounds above competition.
It’s basically the Tesla of the ev industry.
imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
First of all I think you meant the Tesla of the internet provider industry. And also, by your definition, even Tesla isn’t the Tesla of the EV industry 😅
Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world 1 year ago
What do you mean ?
MeanEYE@lemmy.world 1 year ago
“Tesla of the ev industry”… meaning overpriced shit. Kind of is considering other satellite providers offer far cheaper service but with higher latency.
Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Not in my neck of the woods. Need to think bigger than USA
MeanEYE@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Unless you need low latency and have nothing better around, yeah I can see how Starlink is best for you.