Comment on Millions turn to AI chatbots for spiritual guidance and confession
Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 day agoIs it somehow better to go to an actual church or pay someone to confide in?
Objectively yes.
A real person isn’t a stochastic parrot yes-anding whatever stupid idea falls out of your head and is less likely to provide obsequious responses to questions asked.
A real person is less likely to compile what you say to them and mine data from it or turn it over to authorities without a warrant.
A real person also has the ability to actually understand what you’re saying and provide an intelligent response rather than getting back a statistical block of words that are mathematically good words to use based on the underlying model.
TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 day ago
having the ability to do so doesn’t necessarily mean they will do so.
There are plenty of terrible therapists, preists, family, and friends out there. Personally I gave up on asking for people for ‘advice’ 20 years ago.
Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 day ago
No, but they have a profit motive to do so. And I’d rather assume the worst and be wrong rather than deal with another 23andMe situation in a decade. Because it will happen eventually. VC money isn’t endless, and they’re pissing away money like a pro athlete in a club.
You can trust them if you want, but I’m not naive enough to do that myself.
Preaching to the choir, I’ve dumped people from all noted categories for being shitty. I gave up on therapy about 15 years ago but my partner convinced me to go back. I looked for someone who fit my specific needs, and found someone who is rebuilding my trust in therapists
I trust my therapist not to randomly decide to give out my info because their job relies on that. AI chat bots flat out tell you they will use what you give them for their ‘training’ purposes, which means they have access to it and can use it or sell it as they please.
NewDayRocks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
For some people, paying with their data is a lot cheaper than paying for therapy or religion. I do not fault them for this, especially if they are getting similar results.
Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 day ago
That ‘if’ is doing a hurculean amount of effort, given the reports of ChatGPT psychosis, because again, you’re dealing with a stochastic parrot not a real person giving you actual advice.