Very well thought out response. Will respond in kind.
HurrDeeeDurrr K
NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 6 months ago
Well what you said is not true, but since you are so interested in this, why limit it to AI? Just quit using computers all together.
Very well thought out response. Will respond in kind.
HurrDeeeDurrr K
Thanks for clarifying. You made up statistics, your post is nonsense.
And you responded without any consideration that the consistent reliance on computers, in general, is using a HUGE amount of energy, AI or not, indicate that you simply want to chase windmills and not have a conversation. Well played.
HurrDeeeDurrrr indeed. Next time let the grown ups talk.
Gaslighting schmuck. I “made up” nothing. Good day.
Arrg! I didnt mean to delete what I wrote I was just trying to update it.
You confused energy use with pollution.
And what I wrote before was:
I basically said that I was serious, people if they cared would stop using computers. But I am not, you are not, so data centers are going to grow no matter what we do, and computing use is going to increase energy consumption. We need to (even says in the article you posted in the links) improve efficiency, get better hardware, use lower cost training models, use energy recovery and not use lossy evaporator cooling.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 6 months ago
What is not true?
NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 6 months ago
They said that AI is polluting worse than global air travel. They are mixing up pollution vs energy used. If it was pollution global air travel creates 80 Million Tons of CO a month. All AI in use is 15 million tons a month. Global air travel is far more polluting.
As an aside, and this is crazy: there is a mention, in the article OP posted, that suggests that humans, are far worse than AI for CO creation depending on the task. Which I found surprising.
The data comes a paper in the journal Nature:
Ok I honestly did not see that coming.
jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 6 months ago
lmao time for a new wave of doomerism and anti-humanity