The problem with that is you’re tying up the government’s ability to change in ways that have no correlate in industry or culture. This inevitably leads to government being unable to respond to changes that have already occurred or are currently occurring, and in the case of change driven by industry (i.e., most societal change in the US) that invariably leads to regulatory capture.
Nemo@slrpnk.net 4 hours ago
The government needs to adapt, yes, but carefully. You can’t just run with the first or second option, that’s a recipe for regulatory capture.
It’s not “no change is good” but rather “most change isn’t good, so we need to test them until we find the best change”.
aesthelete@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
The problem with that is you’re tying up the government’s ability to change in ways that have no correlate in industry or culture. This inevitably leads to government being unable to respond to changes that have already occurred or are currently occurring, and in the case of change driven by industry (i.e., most societal change in the US) that invariably leads to regulatory capture.