Comment on Charlie Kirk says gun deaths "unfortunately" worth it to keep 2nd amendment

• damnedfurry@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  That is not advocating for people to be shot, and I have a feeling you know that and are just being obtuse.

  An actual equivalent analogy to what you quoted would be saying that we shouldn’t ban a sport just because some people get hurt playing it. If someone said that, would you claim they’re advocating for players of that sport to get hurt?

  Of course not. Use your brain.

  source

  • theacharnian@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Sure whatever man.

    source

    • damnedfurry@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Sure whatever man. It’s not that important.

      You thought it was important enough to say in the first place (and also double down once after your error was already made crystal clear).

      Is it really that hard to just genuinely accept being wrong about something without the asinine passive-aggression? Grow up.

      source