Not LAMF unless he was explicitly advocating for others to be shot.
Hence ‘voted for leopards eating faces party, didn’t expect them to eat my face’.
Comment on Charlie Kirk says gun deaths "unfortunately" worth it to keep 2nd amendment
theacharnian@lemmy.ca 21 hours ago
Leopards ate his face.
damnedfurry@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 5 hours ago
His position is basically “Leopards should be allowed to run rampant among people, even if some people get eaten.” Then he gets eaten.
theacharnian@lemmy.ca 20 hours ago
Charlie Kirk Says Gun Deaths ‘Unfortunately’ Worth it to Keep 2nd Amendment
Other people’s deaths.
damnedfurry@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
That is not advocating for people to be shot, and I have a feeling you know that and are just being obtuse.
An actual equivalent analogy to what you quoted would be saying that we shouldn’t ban a sport just because some people get hurt playing it. If someone said that, would you claim they’re advocating for players of that sport to get hurt?
Of course not. Use your brain.
TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 20 hours ago
I laughed at this