Comment on Charlie Kirk says gun deaths "unfortunately" worth it to keep 2nd amendment

theacharnian@lemmy.ca ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• damnedfurry@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Not LAMF unless he was explicitly advocating for others to be shot.

  Hence ‘voted for leopards eating faces party, didn’t expect them to eat my face’.

  source

  • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    His position is basically “Leopards should be allowed to run rampant among people, even if some people get eaten.” Then he gets eaten.

    source
  • theacharnian@lemmy.ca ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Charlie Kirk Says Gun Deaths ‘Unfortunately’ Worth it to Keep 2nd Amendment

    Other people’s deaths.

    source

    • damnedfurry@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      That is not advocating for people to be shot, and I have a feeling you know that and are just being obtuse.

      An actual equivalent analogy to what you quoted would be saying that we shouldn’t ban a sport just because some people get hurt playing it. If someone said that, would you claim they’re advocating for players of that sport to get hurt?

      Of course not. Use your brain.

      source

      • theacharnian@lemmy.ca ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Sure whatever man.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I laughed at this

  source