Comment on Fediverse or Decentralisation?

woshang@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• blue_berry@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Please call it “federated network” and “P2P social network” or full dezentralized network

  source

  • tioute@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    That’s exactly what I’m trying to say. Fediverse is decentralised to some extent, but it’s not fully decentralised.

    source
• Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Personally I’d move that “possibility of banning” to a positive

  Imagine being unable to ban spammers, scammers, or people posting illegal content.

  Or hell even being unable to remove posts

  Yeah fediverse is better IMO

  source

  • schmorpel@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    If individual users have ways to ban and/or filter spam on the individual level they don’t have to have others moderate content for them.

    source
  • woshang@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    True, it depends.

    source
• blue_berry@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  [deleted]

  source

  • trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Also completely ignores the fact that there are genuinely good reasons to ban certain people from a social media platform.

    The “Free speech absolutist” position is pretty much braindead.

    source