blue_berry
@blue_berry@lemmy.world
- Social Software Hacker Theory #1 – Conflict-Encouraging- vs. Discussion-Encouraging-UI-Design on the Fediversefungiverse.wordpress.com ↗Submitted 2 months ago to fediverse@lemmy.world | 2 comments
- Comment on Regarding sublinks and feeling concerned about what is going on with it 2 months ago:
Thanks :)
- Comment on Regarding sublinks and feeling concerned about what is going on with it 2 months ago:
Do you know how far the development is?
- Comment on Bonfire Launches Open Science Network for Academics and Researchers 3 months ago:
I guess its federated so the people running it will determine that.
Also, if you have to sign in with ORCHID, which identifies you, you will be careful to post useless garbage papers. I think the integration of ORCHID is really clever. That’s at least what I think it will be used for too, right?
- Comment on Nilay Patel tells Decoder guest host Hank Green why blogs are still great 3 months ago:
I don’t know about the current state of the project, but last time I used WriteFreely, it was kind of meh. Very barebone, the server I used often crashed :(
- Stop searching for Gold in the Fediverse – it’s the social capital, stupid!fungiverse.wordpress.com ↗Submitted 3 months ago to fediverse@lemmy.world | 0 comments
- Submitted 3 months ago to fediverse@lemmy.world | 12 comments
- Comment on Diagon Lemmy - A Queer-friendly, Harry Potter-themed Lemmy Server is now live (before you block me instantly, please hear me out) 4 months ago:
Yeah, I think those are good. I read “The Master and Margarita”, its also about magic (not children’s novel though).
I mean, I wouldn’t have a problem with just doing another fantasy series instead. In my opinion, the magic system is the most unique thing about Harry Potter, because it teaches people certain things about the digital world. You can delete things, you can move things around, you can make things appear and disappear.
- Submitted 5 months ago to fediverse@lemmy.world | 1 comment
- “The Dawn of Everything” and the Fediverse: How the Fediverse could help humanity to embrace its full potential of different forms of societyfungiverse.wordpress.com ↗Submitted 5 months ago to technology@lemmy.world | 2 comments
- “The Dawn of Everything” and the Fediverse: How the Fediverse could help humanity to embrace its full potential of different forms of societyfungiverse.wordpress.com ↗Submitted 5 months ago to fediverse@lemmy.world | 7 comments
- Comment on web4 – The Second End of History? 5 months ago:
No web3 is skipped. Next comes the social web. The articles name is misleading. CollectiveWeb would be more fitting then web4
- Comment on web4 – The Second End of History? 5 months ago:
Mmh, I remain sceptical
- Comment on web4 – The Second End of History? 5 months ago:
How does moderation work there?
- Comment on web4 – The Second End of History? 5 months ago:
Its skipped. In between comes the social web/fediverse.
- Comment on web4 – The Second End of History? 5 months ago:
But yeah, its not ideal …
- Comment on web4 – The Second End of History? 5 months ago:
Ok, you are right. Its not a separate specicies. So call it homo sapiens-digitalis and yeah, some people are kind of already there.
Altough in terms of digital agency, I think we could still go a long way.
- Comment on web4 – The Second End of History? 5 months ago:
web10? webX? I like web4 because people already can categorize it.
- Submitted 5 months ago to technology@lemmy.world | 21 comments
- Submitted 5 months ago to fediverse@lemmy.world | 12 comments
- Comment on House of J (John+Joan Mastodon), or: Five Ways the Fediverse could help to save Liberal Democracy 5 months ago:
That’s still possible without banning corporations completely from the Fediverse (which will not be possible anyways). It’s just melancholic daydreaming.
- Comment on House of J (John+Joan Mastodon), or: Five Ways the Fediverse could help to save Liberal Democracy 5 months ago:
That’s black and white thinking and undemocratic. Conservatives respect democracy and should therefore be a part of it.
Also they obviously something to contribute, next to Liberalism and Socialism, Conservatism is one of the biggest political traditions. Let’s not be so stupid to assume that it’s complete bullshit.
Conservatism protects traditional institutions, watches that change is not too fast and traditionally, also warns against too much destructering of traditional societal structures by the market. Maybe modern conservatives don’t necessary do all of that, but it’s a tradition that has earned itself.
- Comment on House of J (John+Joan Mastodon), or: Five Ways the Fediverse could help to save Liberal Democracy 5 months ago:
Firstly: commerzialization will come eventually anyways.
Secondly: what has all of that to do with democracy? I would hope that the Fediverse thrives to become a democratic place.
- Comment on House of J (John+Joan Mastodon), or: Five Ways the Fediverse could help to save Liberal Democracy 5 months ago:
You can have that. But I also want conservatives in the Fediverse to simulate societal debate better here. Defederation still exists, of course.
It’s not about agreeing on everything but about finding common grounds again between opposing parties that at least share some common values.
- Comment on House of J (John+Joan Mastodon), or: Five Ways the Fediverse could help to save Liberal Democracy 5 months ago:
What do you mean? Sure with Nazis and Tankies I’m okay to split with permanentaly, but other instances its a dynamic, always changing process. This is much more what societal debate looks like than on Twitter/Threads currently.
In the Fediverse, finding together is encouraged because it increases your user base. On Twitter, fight means more money for the owner, so fights and splits are encouraged there.
So yes, Fediverse is better at simulating societal debate. It’s not about preventing splitting in the complete Fediverse (this will happen anyways), its about preventing a split of democratic forces into tribes that fight each other and don’t manage to unite.
- Comment on House of J (John+Joan Mastodon), or: Five Ways the Fediverse could help to save Liberal Democracy 5 months ago:
I’m not saying that your instance needs to federate with her. But it would be good to have her as part of the Fediverse and say: look world, in the Fediverse, people can discuss things much better than on Twitter.
That’s all I’m saying. I’m not even saying she is a good or bad person. I do think some of her statements are transphobic, but I also think she got radicalized because of the cultur war. I’m pretty sure in the Fediverse, once discussions are not heated up by algorithms, some people might become more moderate again.
Will this be the case for Rowling? Not necessarily. But she should still be in the Fediverse.
(Or at least at some point; counting her in this early may have been too provocative)
- House of J (John+Joan Mastodon), or: Five Ways the Fediverse could help to save Liberal Democracyfungiverse.wordpress.com ↗Submitted 5 months ago to fediverse@lemmy.world | 22 comments
- Comment on The free fediverses should focus on consent (including consent-based federation), privacy, and safety 5 months ago:
Sounds fine at first glance
- Comment on The free fediverses should focus on consent (including consent-based federation), privacy, and safety 5 months ago:
Free fediverse(s) makes sense. A bit provocative but so what; its a heated debate in any case.
- Comment on The free fediverses should focus on consent (including consent-based federation), privacy, and safety 5 months ago:
Ok, I may have blown the discussion a bit out of proposition earlier. It’s just that I thought you meant basically the whole Fediverse. The name “Free Fediverse” is a bit misleading imo.