Yeah, that’s low. I don’t bother with anything below 320 kbps.
Comment on It's Not Just You: Music Streaming Is Broken Now
maccentric@sh.itjust.works 14 hours agoThat bitrate seems low? I always thought 160-192kbps was the floor for a decent sounding rip, but it’s been over a decade since I’ve even had a CD so maybe things are different now
remon@ani.social 14 hours ago
Localhorst86@feddit.org 14 hours ago
The Bitrate part was a joke, yes. 96k is low, although I just remembered a special mp3 codec from NERO that allowed for such low bitrate, at the same perceived sound quality as 128kbps.
But obviously, all my CDs have been ripped as either V2, V0 or 320kbps - I personally have not noticed any difference to FLAC files with either of those qualities.
cosmo@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Almost no one can, or have equipment that can make the difference. That being said, the difference between an old mp3 and a new one is sometimes noticeable at the same bitrate. The encoding algorithm has improved a quite lot since the late 90s. I keep flacs as a master format that I make new encodes from when I want it on my phone and such though.
HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Opus/ogg @256 sounds at least as good as mp3 @320.