Comment on Google's plan to restrict sideloading on Android has a potential escape hatch for users

• Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I don’t understand what that has to do with this conversation?

  source

  • Cethin@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    My, you’re frustrating. If using an unofficial source for applications is called sideloading, why isn’t that term used for desktop computing? The term only exists for phones. The AUR is an unofficial user-run source and is equivalent to a source other than the play/apple store. If that term was actually useful or needed we call installing applications from the AUR sideloading, but we don’t. Clearly the term has no real utility besides making it sound like something you shouldn’t do.

    source

    • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Wow, you’re frustrating. If using an unofficial source for applications is called sideloading, why isn’t that term used for desktop computing?

      You are also frustrating, asking me questions that I’ve already answered: Because 99% of people aren’t using the default app store on desktops.

      source

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Yes they are! That’s what I’m saying. 99% of apps aren’t coming from the AUR. Why don’t we call it sideloading, if it were actually a term that were needed?

        source

        • -> View More Comments