Comment

Comment on Big Surprise—Nobody Wants 8K TVs

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

Even 1080p isn’t hugely different from 4k in many cases. Yeah, you can probably notice it, but both are fantastic resolutions. I’ve had a 4k TV for years, and I can count the number of times I’ve actually watched 4k content on it on two hands because it generally isn’t worth the storage space or extra cost.

source

Sort:hotnew top

SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
depends how far you are from the screen.

source
- sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  True. Our TV is 10-15 ft/3-5m away on a ~60in screen, and at that distance, the difference is noticable, but not significant. We have a 40" screen with much closer viewing distance (usually 5-8 ft/~2m), and we definitely notice the difference there.
  
  If I was watching movies at a desk w/ a computer monitor, I’d certainly notice 1080p vs 4k, provided the screen is large enough. In our living room with the couch much further from the screen, the difference is much less important.
  
  source
Showroom7561@lemmy.ca ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
I find that it really depends on the content on the size of the display.

The larger the display, the more you’d benefit from having a higher resolution.

For instance, a good quality 1080p stream vs a highly compressed 4k stream probably won’t look much different. But a “raw” 4k stream looks incredible… think of the demos you see in stores showing off 4k TVs… that quality is noticeable.

Put the same content on a 50"+ screen, and you’ll see the difference.

When I had Netflix, watching in 4k was great, but to me, having HDR is “better”.

On a computer monitor, there’s a case for high-resolution displays because they allow you to fit more on the screen without making the content look blurry. But on a TV, 4k + HDR is pretty much peak viewing for most people.

That’s not to say that if you create content, 8k is useless. It can be really handy when cropping or re-framing if needed, assuming the desired output is less than 8k.

source
- SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  
  think of the demos you see in stores showing off 4k TVs… that quality is noticeable.
  
  Because stores use a high quality feed and force you to stand withing 4ft of the display. There is a whole science to how Best Buy manipulates TV sales. They will not let you adjust TV picture settings on lower margin TVs.
  
  source
  - Showroom7561@lemmy.ca ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    
    Because stores use a high quality feed
    
    Yes, obviously, and consumers who are buying such high-end displays should do their best to provide the highest quality source to play back on those displays.
    
    Distance from the display is important, too. On a small TV, you’ll be close to it, but resolution won’t matter as much.
    
    But from across the room, you want a higher resolution display up to a certain point, or else you’ll see large pixels, and that looks terrible.
    
    Personally, going with a 4k TV was a big leap, but the addition of HDR and an OLED display (for black blacks) had the most impact.
    
    source
- sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  
  think of the demos you see in stores showing off 4k TVs… that quality is noticeable.
  
  Sure. But remember that much of the time, the content is tuned for what the display is good at, which won’t necessarily reflect what you want to watch on it (i.e. they’re often bright colors with frequent color changes, whereas many movies are dark with many slow parts). At least at the start, many 4k TVs had a worse picture than higher end 1080p TVs, and that’s before HDR was really a thing.
  
  So yeah, it highly depends on the content. As you mentioned, in many cases, 1080p HDR will be better than 4k non-HDR. Obviously 4k HDR on a good display is better than 1080p HDR on a good display, but the difference is much less than many people claim it to be, especially at a typical TV viewing distance (in our case, 10-15 ft/3-5m).
  
  computer monitor
  
  I find the sweet spot to be 1440p. 4k is nicer, but the improvement over 1440p is much less than 1440p vs 1080p. My desktop monitor is a 27" 1440p monitor w/ approx 109 ppi, and my work laptop is a Macbook Pro w/ 3024x1964 resolution w/ approx 254 ppi, more than double. And honestly, they’re comparable. Text and whatnot is certainly sharper on the nicer display, but there are certainly diminishing returns.
  
  That said, if I were to watch movies frequently on my computer, I’d prefer a larger 4k monitor so 1080p content upscales better. But for games and normal computer stuff, 1440p is plenty.
  
  Given that I don’t find a ton of value in 4k over 1080p, 8k will be even more underwhelming.
  
  source