Comment on Implementing Portable User Identities with DIDs
AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 3 days agoThe problem is the github issue has hallucinations and incorrect technical terminology. It really shouldn’t be used for this purpose, it’s pretty selfish to expect maintainers to consider something that you used LLM for in my opinion. I don’t think that’s elitist, is it really all that difficult to write a feature request on your own, especially if you’ve already done the hard part (the research)?
muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world 3 days ago
I did the research I looked at many different way to get the desired solution. I learned how ATProto works i looked into other services with did got an llm to put those ideas in the required format for the issue. Can you please point out the hallucinations in the issue so i can go and fix them
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 3 days ago
No. Asking other people to read (and now also to correct!) your LLM slop is extremely inconsiderate. Please don’t do that again.
muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Someone claimed it contained hallucinations. I read through the entire thing as well as doing all the research and understanding of the concept being talked about. If someone is claiming that their are issues I expect them to be able to prove that. I’m not asking for a fact checker I’m asking for someone to provide evidence of the thing they verbatim claimed. If u wanna tell me that my research showing the sky is blue is wrong I would appreciate u pointing out my error otherwise ur just making baseless claims.
Magnum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 days ago
I also don’t get it, as far as I understood you only used the LLM to have a spell checker on crack basically and not generate the idea or straight up technical solution so whats all the fuzz about?
muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world 3 days ago
That’s exactly what I did. Its essentially a translater from 3 pages of dotpoints and notes that would be incoherent to anyone but myself to normal English.