…Change to the constitution to allow first peoples more say over things that directly affect them via establishing a representative body.
Voting no means that you are against the above. Voting yes means you’re for it.
If you’re against it, it does feel quite racist as you’re voting not to have an indigenous voice enshrined in our constitution. Why not let them have a fair go?
seiryth@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It literally does. By voting no you’re saying you do not believe there should be a council that advises on first people’s affairs. So either;
gorkette@aussie.zone 1 year ago
The representative body can be established without a change to the Constitution.
seiryth@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Not really. Because if it could, it would have. This forces it to happen without liberal/conservative interference.
The fact that it’s been impossible thus far to create a significant body to the point where said group of people have forced a referendum to occur should be enough proof that it needs to occur.
The other part of this is it’s not the US. No one knows our constitution, and up until this point most probably didn’t even know we had one…