Comment on Intel details everything that could go wrong with US taking a 10% stake

• FauxPseudo@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Are you in favor of this?

  source

  • Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    In favour of what

    source

    • FauxPseudo@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      The government holding ownership stakes in companies. If so, have you been in favor for a long time or did it start this week? Because I’m focusing on the people that just recently adopted this position after years of opposition to anything that even smelled like government interfering with business.

      source

      • Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        I never took a stance on it.

        Examples of federal Crown corporations include: the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation Canada Post

        These are fine, fairly high quality in terms of service. And I guess in general these two having revenue streams and self funding mean that I don’t pay taxes to run a national broadcaster and our postal service.

        I would rather not have junk mail or advertisements in our public broadcasts. I would have to look at numbers to say whether the taxes are a worthwhile trade-off.

        I do not want news or mail to only have corporate owned options, because then capitalist interests would have a much heavier influence on communications is Canada. I wish we had a national crown ISP, for the same reason.

        In Canada, state-owned corporations are referred to as Crown corporations, indicating that an organization is established by law, owned by the sovereign (either in right of Canada or a province), and overseen by parliament and cabinet.

        source

        • -> View More Comments