Like I said in another comment, unless they get tens of millions of actual unique-not-spam responses they will not even consider reconsidering. People aren’t going to de-google in any great numbers from this, because most of the people this will affect are already de-googled.
Rather than degoogling telling them you will go to Apple and opt for apple services is likely the more powerful response, since that is what the regular person is more likely to do. If degoogled is used they’ll likely dismiss it assuming it is just one of those niche nerds. But an exodus to Apple is a threat that is more realistic.
buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 month ago
That’s why keywords are important. For instance I added the fact that if they continue in this course I will seek to de-Google my phones.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 month ago
Like I said in another comment, unless they get tens of millions of actual unique-not-spam responses they will not even consider reconsidering. People aren’t going to de-google in any great numbers from this, because most of the people this will affect are already de-googled.
Lfrith@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Rather than degoogling telling them you will go to Apple and opt for apple services is likely the more powerful response, since that is what the regular person is more likely to do. If degoogled is used they’ll likely dismiss it assuming it is just one of those niche nerds. But an exodus to Apple is a threat that is more realistic.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 month ago
But that makes no sense - they’ll go to someone who is even more restrictive in side loading?