The non-pro iphone 15 uses a different processor (A16 vs A17) which doesn’t have the controller for 10gbps speeds. Its the processor from the iphone 14 pro.
Comment on Apple forced to ditch iPhone lightning charger
JDPoZ@lemmy.world 1 year ago
[deleted]
Ocelot@lemmies.world 1 year ago
hackitfast@lemmy.world 1 year ago
lobut@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
An apropos of that, I was looking to buy a mac mini because it looks so affordable. However, if I want more storage or RAM, I’m screwed.
I decided to buy a mini PC and installed mint. If I wanted the same amount of RAM it would have been like twice the price.
hquest123@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’m not defending apple (their upgrades are insane) but it’s not the same type of RAM. It’s a unified on chip memory that can be accessed way faster than ddr5.
hansl@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The question isn’t if the chip is there, but whether the regulations require it to be there.
ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The 15 uses an older chip that was designed for iPhones with lighting cables limited to USB 2. So it’s unlikely the hardware is there for USB 3/4 speeds. But it’s not unfeasible to add a dedicated chip for faster USB speeds.
Where as the pro model uses a new chipset. Designed for the 15 pro and likely the 16 non-pro. This has on due USB 3. It would be short sighted to not include it here.
Both phones would have very fast WiFi, I imagine that’s the use case for 90%+ of users.
gian@lemmy.grys.it 1 year ago
Nah, let Apple cripple their own products out of spite…
Stubborn9867@lemmy.jnks.xyz 1 year ago
Are you sure it’s firmware or software limited?
I assumed they just kept the lightning controller, which as you said had USB 2.0 speeds, and then hardwired a USB-C adapter into the phone/circuit board. So it’s a hardware limit.