Don’t you have to fire bricks in a kiln? Surely that puts off some CO2?
Comment on anons brother has some strong opinions
jnod4@lemmy.ca 21 hours agoBricks would be much more efficient co2 wise, they don’t have the curing process that pollutes
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 hours ago
jnod4@lemmy.ca 14 hours ago
You just cook them up electrically, I haven’t seen a charcoal kiln in ages
MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 hours ago
I wonder how the co2 from drying/making bricks compares
RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 21 hours ago
They also put out a lot of CO2 and you’d have a hell of a lot of issues scaling the brick production to the same level. Not to mention all the othe associated issues that bricks have.
It’s just a poor replacement for concrete at the same scale. But that’s not to knock bricks specifically, since nothing really is a good replacement at that scale.
Best we could do is to not build as much or in such a big scale, but that has issues too.
jnod4@lemmy.ca 19 hours ago
You can bake bricks using clean energy but the chemical process for creating cement itself creates co2… Y’all down voting and never held a brick in yer lives
RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 19 hours ago
You can also cpature the CO2 and use it in chemical processes where it is needed. Bizarrely often they’re buying the CO2 for high price even though if capture methods were common we’d have loads of stock.
Also I work in construction with both concrete and bricks and have been involved in mass production of both. But go off lol
jnod4@lemmy.ca 14 hours ago
An interesting document comparing both …org.uk/…/Clay-v-Concrete-Brick-A-Comparative-Gui…