Comment

dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

I’m not sure recommending Popper to someone who has never studied philosophy, and who is reading on their own, a good idea … I would probably start with a small intro to philosophy book like Blackburn’s Think and then try to find lectures or resources that help teach Popper, rather than just diving into source material with no guidance.

source

Sort:hotnew top

wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
Excellent points!

source
- dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  sorry, I conflated what you said about falsifiability being the most popular framework with thinking he did solve the problem of induction, lol - I had just woken up when I responded to you, my apologies 😅
  
  Popper is great, also recommend Hilary Putnam’s “The ‘Corroboration’ of Theories” on Popper. I admittedly adore Putnam, but it’s a nice overview of Popper’s view of induction and its problems.
  
  Thomas Kuhn (The Structure of Scientific Revolutions) and his idea of paradigm shifts is also worth mentioning here, and Kuhn comes up in Putnam’s chapter, too.
  
  source