If you run any instance that is federated and has users that could sign in from that state it makes complete sense to block their IP addresses. Why on earth would someone running a Mastodon instance take on risk unlless they were in another country where there was no risk of repercussions.
If you’re just hoping that small fish won’t get fried that’s possibly true. But admins likely won’t want to find out if they will just on principles.
Carighan@piefed.world 7 months ago
How come plenty federated stuff is also blocking people then? Apparently that alone does not help?
Kirk@startrek.website 7 months ago
ActivityPub instances can do whatever the hell they want, the point is that no CEO decided who has access to all of it.
Carighan@piefed.world 7 months ago
Each instance still has an owner. Just like the Bluesky CEO, they need to decide whether the (legal) risks are worth it to them and whether they can cover the (legal) costs if needed.
For any individual instance owner, this changes nothing.
Kirk@startrek.website 7 months ago
yeah but mastodon has thousands of owners and bluesky has one so its different see