Comment on 95% of Companies See ‘Zero Return’ on $30 Billion Generative AI Spend, MIT Report Finds
surph_ninja@lemmy.world 12 hours agoThen sell your services as a consultant to these businesses, and let them know it’s not actually doing anything different. Let the researchers know that Ai cant possibly be finding cancer at better rates than humans, because nothing’s changed.
Let the world know they fell for it, setup puts against the companies, and make bank.
ilinamorato@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Are you trying to claim that the fact that there’s lots of money flowing to these AI companies is proof that AI isn’t just a bubble caused by money flowing to these AI companies?
surph_ninja@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
I’m saying, if you’re so confident it’s a bubble, why don’t you bet your life savings on it?
ilinamorato@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
First of all, because it doesn’t matter whether it’s actually real or not, investment doesn’t actually follow innovation. The actual value of a company or idea has almost nothing to do with its valuation.
But more importantly, why do you think that’s the important part of this conversation? I’m not talking about its long term viability. Neither were you. You were just saying that it was a new innovation and still had to mature. I was saying that it was actually a much older technology that already matured, and which is being given an artificial new round of funding because of good marketing.
surph_ninja@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
So are you alleging the studies, like the ones showing AI is vastly superior at identifying cancer in patients, are fabricated?