Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Wrong, they already had that with Excel. There were a bunch of functions that delivered wrong returns for years, and none of the users (mostly economists) had noticed.
Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Wrong, they already had that with Excel. There were a bunch of functions that delivered wrong returns for years, and none of the users (mostly economists) had noticed.
stringere@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
What, you don’t always work with 16 digit numbers that are automatically truncated? What could go wrong? We don’t use 16 digit numbers for anything, really./
It’s hard to believe that’s still a thing but it is!