Comment on SpaceX says states should dump fiber plans, give all grant money to Starlink

• queermunist@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I’m just trying to understand why this argument is even happening.

  You seem to basically agree with them. What’s even the point?

  source

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    It is simply harder to sabotage if the wires are underground and cannot be readily seen by hostile actors.

    This statement is not correct. It is the topic being discussed. Fiber network are more vulnerable than satellite networks. It takes specialized weapons to take out a single satellite link. Any idiot with wire clippers can take out a fiber link, an it happens all the gime. Fiber networks are more difficult to replace at scale than a satellite network, and individuals links are more important to fiber network than they are to satellite networks.

    source

    • queermunist@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      The thread topic is SpaceX saying we should dump all fiber plans and go with Starlink.

      I had to clarify what you were arguing about, because otherwise I was going to yell at you about latency issues and data throttling and the risks of Kessler syndrome and about how bad it is to put critical infrastructure in the hands of a single company.

      source

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        I’m well aware of those issues as well, which is why I’m not pro-starlink replacing all terrestrial networks.

        source

        • -> View More Comments