Comment on Does the AGPL license allows not disclosing the source of third party scripts indirectly interacting with the main software?

stinerman@midwest.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

This is a question about what constitutes a derivative work. IANAL and that’s a difficult question most of the time. I’m not going to try to answer it. I’m reasonably sure that the last 3 are not derivative works, but again, IANAL.

If something is a derivative work of an AGPL-licensed product, that work must also be AGPL. This basically means you must provide source to anyone who has a copy of the binary or any user of the software. If only you are using the script, it’s a pretty trivial case. You’re the only author/user of the software and you have the source so you’re in compliance.

source
Sort:hotnewtop