If you pass a whole raw disk, not virtualized, then TrueNAS should not complain.
Although Smart data counters live on each individual disk, it is accessed via the disk controller interface. No controller, no smart data.
Comment on Am I corrupting my data?
frongt@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
If you pass a whole raw disk, not virtualized, then TrueNAS should not complain. I don’t know if you can do that in proxmox, I haven’t tried.
Personally I’d get rid of TrueNAS. Even if docker is down, the VM with the data is still up and accessible over anything running on the VM, like scp via ssh.
non_burglar@lemmy.world 1 day ago
thelemonalex@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I passed the whole raw disk in theory, but I’ve read that even if you do that, it’s still virtualized somehow. But I don’t know enough about it, I’m just basing this on the research I’ve done so far. About skipping TrueNAS, maybe you’re right, but if I also want to set up SMB shares? Is there a tool or something that makes it easy for someone with limited experience? It would also need to handle replication of data, and the advantage of ZFS Replication over using something like rsync, is that you can simply push the delta between snapshots, instead of replacing entire files, or at least that’s how I’ve understood this.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
If you pass the disk the meta data isn’t passed though including SMART data so it is a ticking time bomb.