Very wrong
In 2023 AI used 40 TWh of energy in the US out of a total 176 TWh used by data centers
Comment on We hate AI because it's everything we hate
CorvidCawder@sh.itjust.works 1 week agoNot even remotely close to this scale… At most you could compare the energy usage to the miners in the crypto craze, but I’m pretty sure that even that is just a tiny fraction of what’s going on right now.
iopq@lemmy.world 6 days ago
CorvidCawder@sh.itjust.works 6 days ago
From the blog you quoted yourself:
Despite improving AI energy efficiency, total energy consumption is likely to increase because of the massive increase in usage. A large portion of the increase in energy consumption between 2024 to 2023 is attributed to AI-related servers. Their usage grew from 2 TWh in 2017 to 40 TWh in 2023. This is a big driver behind the projected scenarios for total US energy consumption, ranging from 325 to 580 TWh (6.7% to 12% of total electricity consumption) in the US by 2028.
(And likewise, the last graph of predictions for 2028)
From a quick read of that source, it is unclear to me if it factors in the electricity cost of training the models. It seems to me that it doesn’t.
I found more information here: technologyreview.com/…/ai-energy-usage-climate-fo…
Racks of servers hum along for months, ingesting training data, crunching numbers, and performing computations. This is a time-consuming and expensive process—it’s estimated that training OpenAI’s GPT-4 took over $100 million and consumed 50 gigawatt-hours of energy, enough to power San Francisco for three days.
So, I’m not sure if those numbers for 2023 paint the full picture. And adoption of AI-powered tools was definitely not as high in 2023 as it is nowadays. So I wouldn’t be surprised if those numbers were much higher than the reported 22.7% of the total server power usage in the US.
Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Crypto miners wish they could be this inefficient. No literally they do. They’re the “rolling coal” mfers of the internet.