Comment

Comment on Study: Social media probably can’t be fixed

I’m on Lemmy, am I not?

It CAN be fixed, the question if the will is there.

While and improvement Lemmy is far from perfect. The upvote-downvote sytem of reddit alone encourages group think and self censorship. It doesn’t really help that much that we can go circlejerk in some other instance if we get hated on or banned by mods. We are still encouraged to keep in line to keep the bubble intact.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Zak@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
After 20 years of living with it, I’ve decided I don’t like the downvote. The upvote is fine.

Reddit’s founders, early on tried to encourage people to treat the downvote as moderation. It was meant to mean that a thing doesn’t belong on reddit and people shouldn’t see it. Of course that quickly became mere dislike or disagreement.

I’d prefer an approach that requires some input about what’s wrong with a post in order to reduce its prominence; a restricted list of options as in Slashdot’s moderation would be sufficient, I think. I’m not sure whether this should necessarily require also making a report to a more powerful admin/moderator, but I lean toward making that optional in most communities.

source
- frongt@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  
  I’d prefer an approach that requires some input about what’s wrong with a post in order to reduce its prominence
  
  A lot of the time, I downvote troll content that should not be engaged with. Like, not technically against the rules, but definitely someone who is not posting in good faith. If I responded to the post, I’d be contributing to the problem.
  
  source
  - Zak@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    I don’t mean replying, but selecting from a menu of possible reasons to downrank a post. Slashdot’s moderation system that I mentioned earlier has (or had - haven’t looked there in a while) “troll” as one of the categories.
    
    source