cost :/ and low energy conversion efficiency.
Comment on Butter made from carbon tastes like the real thing, gets backing from Bill Gates
MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
Why not just make a fuel that can power cars if you’re gonna go this far.
Gsus4@feddit.nl 23 hours ago
cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 22 hours ago
We focus too much on efficiency and cost sometimes. Sometimes efficiency is only a “nice to have” while being outweighed by practicality, convenience, safety, and any of the other factors we choose to make a priority.
It is expensive and inefficient for an airplane to have two engines instead of just one. We do it anyway because it’s required for safety and redundancy. We made that the priority, and that was an active choice. We need to start making more active choices about what the priority is when it comes to our energy futures. All priorities have tradeoffs. Cost and efficiency have their own tradeoffs. Question it when people tell you that things can’t be done because of “cost” or “efficiency”. When they do that they’re presupposing what the priority is, but often it’s billionaires trying to cut corners to make themselves richer at our expense, our safety, our futures. We can do inefficient things. Sometimes it’s even the right choice.
MalMen@masto.pt 22 hours ago
@MuskyMelon @Gsus4 hydrogen probably.. just need further development, I think we are in a technologic race, battery is still winning but it can change..
tal@lemmy.today 22 hours ago
You can get a hydrogen car today. Just that if you’re outside a few places like Japan and California, finding a fueling station might be a bit difficult.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_Mirai