Comment on AOL to discontinue dial-up internet service after 34 years

• shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  That is possible. I was basing my comment on some information from an FCC report that said that there was no place in the continental United States that was not able to be covered by Starlink.

  There was this program called Bead that was going to prioritize places with no internet access whatsoever or dial up for the first people to get funding, and they say they found that there wasn’t any, so they had to go for the next thing which was slow internet.

  source

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    And there’s lots of valid reasons to not want starlink. So it really doesn’t matter if that’s the only option.

    But…

    The American taxpayers have paid telecom companies billions of dollars on at least two separate occasions years apart to roll out broadband to everyone. But they just keep taking money and not doing it, and then a decade later lobby for the money again.

    source

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Yeah, you do make a good point there. I’ve seen that happen. Where a company takes money and doesnt do it. Those companies should be made to repay the money with interest for not doing what they said they would. But I’ve also seen companies that actually do the job and get high-speed internet out to those who wouldn’t have otherwise had it. So I think it really just depends on the company.

      The two companies I’m thinking of right off the top of my head are AT&T and T-Mobile. AT&T took money to roll out broadband and never did so, and T-Mobile merged with Sprint, and said they would roll out high-speed broadband to very rural areas, and actually did do it, and I ended up benefiting from T-Mobile’s home internet rollout.

      I lived in a pretty rural area for a while that had 10 MBPS wired internet or satellite and then T-Mobile came around and with their home internet you could get 70 MBPS so that was a no-brainer

      source