This isn’t the first time they’ve forgotten how various laws work. And they keep losing. Kinda makes you wonder if it’s intentional or not.
radix@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Everytown Law is about to get a lesson on how Section 230 works.
Blamemeta@lemm.ee 1 year ago
hoodatninja@kbin.social 1 year ago
Pretty sure SCOTUS has a case they’re hearing currently that may very well change the scope of section 230 so I’d maybe reserve your quips until after that shakes out lol
radix@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The two big cases this year were already decided: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter,_Inc._v._Taamneh and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzalez_v._Google_LLC
Although both dodged the S230 claims, both made it clear that Twitter and Google, respectively, had no liability.
Is there another case I missed?
hoodatninja@kbin.social 1 year ago
My understanding was that it was sent back but not struck down saying that it just didn’t fall under anti-terrorism laws, but I guess I was mistaken!
someguy3@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Ah, to be based on selective history and tradition.
pc_admin@aussie.zone 1 year ago
Big tech says no.