not yet, it is planned but not there yet
Comment on recommendations for selfhosted photo backup solution: folders vs albums?
ErwinLottemann@feddit.de 9 months ago
i’m a fan of immich, but i don’t think it deletes photos from your phone when deleting it on the server.
Rescuer6394@feddit.nl 9 months ago
zako@lemmy.world 9 months ago
AFAIK immich organize photos with albums not in folders. So, If i move from immich to another software (librephotos, photoprism…), the new software is aware of albums? I am worried on organizing my photos every time I change of photo management application.
JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 9 months ago
That’s an organizational issue. I think almost all photo software (except lychee) is more “hands-off, everything internal” because of a few reasons:
-
If you sync between clients, do you want the software constantly shuffling files around on every device if something is changed in one album?
-
if you have chronological folders, do you want to make duplicates (double or triple the space) for every album including said picture?
-
If you work with albums, how do you deal with random folders not in albums?
-
how do you deal with conflicts of photos being put in different albums on different synced devices?
The solution for all of these is “leave the files where they are” and deal with everything via databases to organize photos. This way you can export or download albums for giving to someone and it will just pull all of the relevant files without having sync or reorganization issues.
-
ayaya@lemdro.id 9 months ago
I wanted to try Immich but I quickly found out you can’t simply point it at an existing folder structure like say Plex or Jellyfin. You have to “import” all your files via a client and if you’re like me and already have thousands of images in Nextcloud then even with their bulk upload CLI tool it is too much of a hassle.
Chaphasilor@feddit.nl 9 months ago
Immich actually organizes your photos in a simple directory structure, which is customizable (want to group by year? year+month? by day? not at all?). The images are right there in your file system and have the original file name.
The directory is “read-only” though, for the same reason as there is a need to import existing libraries: database synchronization.
Immich offers many features that require a database or pre-processing of files, which makes it fast and feature-rich. If you modify files outside of Immich, it cannot know what changed and loses track of where your media is.
As I said, the (read-only) file structure is always there in case you want to switch.
MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 months ago
I didn’t see any unique format for how Immich stores photos, they’re just on the filesystem as images.
ayaya@lemdro.id 9 months ago
From what I understand (I could be wrong) all of the images get imported into a single folder and are done via the database. I have my albums in individual folders. So not only would I have to recreate dozens of albums but I don’t think there would be any way to export them in the future. But if that isn’t how it works maybe I will give it another go.
dubba@lemm.ee 9 months ago
Storage Templates. Photos are stored in subdirectories categorized by date.
CLI Import. It looks like you may be able to import your albums with the cli and --album flag, not sure about exporting though.
Opeth@lemm.ee 9 months ago
I switched from nextcloud to immich and the cli import was super easy and had a nice progress bar which made me feel productive. The images are just in directories on the filesystem unlike seafile.
10/10 would recommend. Shit feels premium as well.
spez_@lemmy.world 9 months ago
There’s an active pull request to add this in. Stay tuned
Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 9 months ago
It’s planned to allow pointing immich to a directory as a read only gallery. This wouldn’t import the images, but still show them.
Can’t find it atm on my phone though.